信赖利益与期待利益的区分

摘  要

富勒的信赖利益理论向我们有力证明了合同信赖利益的保护是合同法目的所在。信赖利益的赔偿不仅在合同不成立或无效的场合存在，而且在合同有效时也会产生。在合同有效时，尽管我们经常看到的是期待利益的赔偿，但其背后真正目的仍然是保护当事人的信赖利益。大陆合同法以“合意论”为理论基础，以合法有效的合同为规范的'中心，以违约责任作为合同责任的主要形式，以预期利益的保护为合同法的主要目的。在这1构造中，信赖利益只起辅助作用，只是在违约责任和侵权责任力所不及的地方发挥作用，只适用于合同的不成立或无效的场合。因此，本文通过分析信赖利益与期待利益的区分和价值，提出我国合同法应借鉴富勒的信赖利益理论完善合同赔偿制度，使得我国法律对合同的保护贯穿于始终。

关键词:合同法；信赖利益；期待利益；哲学分析；实证分析

Abstract

   The reliance interest theory of Fuller powerful proves that the protection of reliance interest of contract is the aim of contract law. Compensation of reliance interest not only exists when contract is untenable or invalid situation, but also exists when contract is effective the contact is effective, we often pay attention to the compensation of expectation interest, but in truth, the purpose still is the protection of parties’ reliance interest contract of Civil law takes “Meeting of mind theory” as theoretical basis , takes legitimate valid contract as the norms’ center ,takes breach liability as the main form of contract liability, takes expectation interest protection as the main goal of contract law. In this continental, reliance interest only plays the assistance role, when breach liability and tort liability is not at work, it is only suitable to the contract in untenable or the invalid. Therefore, this article analysis the difference and value of reliance interest and expectation interest, proposed our country contract law should learn from the reliance interest theory of Fuller consummation contract compensation system, for our country law of the protection passing through the contract to throughout.

Key words: Contract law；reliance interest；expectation interest
philosophical analysis ；the substantial evidence analysis
..............................
注：【包括：毕业论文，任务书，开题报告】